Training and Move Certainty
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 4:00 pm
These are two topics that perhaps could be related.
For starters, Move Certainty appears to have been replaced by Multimedia. This seems to be a matter of screen geography since otherwise they would be in the same spot. I assume the Move Certainty code still exists and it could be added back elsewhere in the window.
I really see a LOT of promise in the Training feature. I have used it a little, and plan to use it more. The problem, for me at least, is to set up a COW book that is suitable for Training. I want to narrow my scope. For example, rather than start with a Black repertoire, I would start with a Tartakover variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined (QGD) repertoire. Later, I would combine repertoires, adding a Vienna variation repertoire, and a QGD exchange variation repertoire.
I want good moves by white and black. How to get started? One way would be to buy an ebook. Another would be to download games where each player is rated above 2400, and import them into COW. These approaches are very feasible. However, even here there may be some moves that I would like to exclude from training. Yet another approach is to use one of my existing COW game files, warts and all, and select moves to include for training, or exclude from training.
Training has an option Must Play Top Candidate. I find this too restrictive. However, not selecting this option has problems too. Too many mistakes or second/third best lines may be included. A Must Play from the Top Four Candidates, might be be better for me. However I realize that selecting four is totally arbitrary, and would not work in all cases anyway.
After all this musing, I concluded that the certainty slider might be a great way to designate a move for inclusion in training. If the certainty was set to high, the move would be used for training. Or perhaps it would make sense to proceed from the opposite direction. All candidates are eligible for training except those whose certainty has been set to low. A command could be added to Train Based on Certainty.
I'm just putting this out for consideration. Feel free to comment, one way or another.
By the way, have you ever studied a position in a book (physical or electronic) and thought you had command of the material, only to reach the position on the board and draw a blank? I've already seen that the training feature simulates that experience! Better a simulation that the real thing.
For starters, Move Certainty appears to have been replaced by Multimedia. This seems to be a matter of screen geography since otherwise they would be in the same spot. I assume the Move Certainty code still exists and it could be added back elsewhere in the window.
I really see a LOT of promise in the Training feature. I have used it a little, and plan to use it more. The problem, for me at least, is to set up a COW book that is suitable for Training. I want to narrow my scope. For example, rather than start with a Black repertoire, I would start with a Tartakover variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined (QGD) repertoire. Later, I would combine repertoires, adding a Vienna variation repertoire, and a QGD exchange variation repertoire.
I want good moves by white and black. How to get started? One way would be to buy an ebook. Another would be to download games where each player is rated above 2400, and import them into COW. These approaches are very feasible. However, even here there may be some moves that I would like to exclude from training. Yet another approach is to use one of my existing COW game files, warts and all, and select moves to include for training, or exclude from training.
Training has an option Must Play Top Candidate. I find this too restrictive. However, not selecting this option has problems too. Too many mistakes or second/third best lines may be included. A Must Play from the Top Four Candidates, might be be better for me. However I realize that selecting four is totally arbitrary, and would not work in all cases anyway.
After all this musing, I concluded that the certainty slider might be a great way to designate a move for inclusion in training. If the certainty was set to high, the move would be used for training. Or perhaps it would make sense to proceed from the opposite direction. All candidates are eligible for training except those whose certainty has been set to low. A command could be added to Train Based on Certainty.
I'm just putting this out for consideration. Feel free to comment, one way or another.
By the way, have you ever studied a position in a book (physical or electronic) and thought you had command of the material, only to reach the position on the board and draw a blank? I've already seen that the training feature simulates that experience! Better a simulation that the real thing.